Independent warehouse audits · Across Uzbekistan
When you need a warehouse audit: 8 signals for owners

· Risk & control · 4 min read

When you need a warehouse audit: 8 signals for owners

Growing stock adjustments, repeat shortages, movement without documents: eight signs a warehouse needs an audit, plus a one-evening self-check.

Many owners think about an audit only when the problem is already large and a feeling that "something is off" has set in. In fact a warehouse shows its illness well in advance: in the numbers and in daily habits. Below are eight signals. You can check most of them yourself from internal reports. If you answer "yes" to more than three, it is time to think seriously about an independent warehouse audit.

Four signals in the numbers

  1. Stock adjustments are growing. In the system, balances are corrected with "surplus" and "shortage" documents. One of them is normal, but adjustments that increase month after month mean the gap between the system and reality is widening. A hypothetical example: monthly sales are 900 million so'm and the adjustments total 3, 5 and 9 million three months running. What worries you is not the level itself but the direction.
  2. Sales rise, profit does not. Turnover has grown while gross margin is lower than expected. The cause could be pricing or it could be losses. The auditor checks the second. A hypothetical example: goods bought at 100 so'm and sold at 130 should carry a 30% mark-up; if the report shows 24% on average, part of the gap may come from goods lost or unrecorded.
  3. Every stock count gives a different result. A shortage once, a surplus next time, then a shortage again. This is rarely chance; more often it is a systematic error in receiving, units of measure or storage locations.
  4. Obsolete stock is piling up. The share of goods that have not moved for a year keeps growing, yet in the books they still sit at full cost. The money is lying on the shelves and the accounts do not show it.

Four signals inside the warehouse

  1. In the system but not on the shelf. Goods promised to a customer cannot be found, picking drags on, the order is cancelled.
  2. One person does everything. The storekeeper receives the goods, enters them in the system, writes them off and also does the counting at stock-take. There is no control here, only trust, and trust is not a substitute for control.
  3. Documents appear after the event. A receipt or issue is entered several days later, sometimes with a back date. The supplier's delivery note goes missing and returned goods sit without paperwork.
  4. A major event happened, no check followed. A storekeeper changed, a new branch opened, 1C was updated or a loan is being planned, but nobody confirmed the balances independently.

What waiting leads to

A shortage becomes more expensive with time. The cause of a year-long discrepancy is much harder to find than that of a two-month one: documents get lost, staff forget details, entries in the system are overwritten by newer ones and part of the camera footage is never kept. A signal caught early is usually solved cheaply: one rule, one change of access rights, one round of retraining.

A one-evening self-check

You can get a first picture without an auditor:

  1. Export the stock adjustment documents for the last 12 months from your system to Excel.
  2. Total them by month and calculate their ratio to sales.
  3. See which employee enters the most adjustments and which product groups keep recurring.
  4. List the items with no movement for a year and compare their total value with all stock.
  5. Go to the warehouse, count twenty random items by hand and compare them with the system.

This does not replace an independent check, because you are reviewing your own team's records. But it shows the direction. If the numbers are in order, there is no need to hurry; if not, you will approach an auditor with a specific question.

When an audit is not needed

Not every warehouse needs a full audit. If the range is small, there is one site, the owner sees it every day and adjustments are almost non-existent, an ordinary stock count and a monthly sample count are enough. An audit pays off when the question is not "how much is missing" but "why is it missing", that is, when you need to understand where and in which process losses arise.

Conclusion

Each of the eight signals on its own may be harmless, but together they give a clear picture. The earlier an independent check takes place, the cheaper and less painful the fix. OmborAudit starts with a site visit and shows with documents which of the signals is a real problem.